Les Misérables
** out of ****
Directed by: Tom Hooper
Starring: Hugh Jackman,
Russell Crowe, Amanda Seyfried, Eddie Redmayne and Anne Hathaway
Running time: 158 minutes
When Tom Hooper’s hotly
anticipated adaptation of (arguably) the most beloved stage production of all
time starts focusing on the class struggle around an hour in, the film starts
living up to its musical legacy. In fact, it would even make Victor Hugo, the
author of Les Misérables, proud.
In June 1832,
dissatisfied Parisian students and insurrectionists revolted against their government, deriding their lack of sympathy toward the lower- and middle-classes. Besieged
behind a barricade, in actuality, was Hugo.
During this middle
section – from the bellows of “Look Down,” through the showstopper “One Day
More” and up until the tissue-grabber “A Little Fall of Rain” – Hooper’s film
largely succeeds. However, although this part of the adaptation achieves the
power and unabashed sincerity fans of the long-running musical expect, this
version is, largely, a Les Miss.
For those unfamiliar with Hugo’s novel or the
musical from Claude-Michel
Schönberg and Alain Boublil, Les Misérables
tells the tale of Jean Valjean (Hugh Jackman), a prisoner who breaks his parole
but chooses a life directed by mercy and forgiveness. Nevertheless, bitter
policeman Javert (Russell Crowe) still pursues Valjean and hopes to capture him
so the ex-con can repay his debt to society.
Eight years after Valjean receives his yellow ticket of leave, he is the mayor of a small town in France. Factory
worker Fantine (Anne Hathaway), who lives in his town,
loses her job. Frightened to spend her life among the mobs of the vagrant poor
and with a child to care for, Fantine prostitutes herself into submission.
On the eve of her death,
Fantine entrusts her daughter’s safety with Valjean. The ex-prisoner retrieves
the girl, a snowy blonde named Cosette, from the care of two malicious
innkeepers, the Thenardiers (Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter). That
young girl will grow up to be played by Amanda Seyfried.
In Valjean’s care, adult Cosette
wishes for a life of normalcy. She falls for a revolutionary named Marius (Eddie
Redmayne), himself the object of affection for the Thenardiers’ daughter,
Eponine (Samantha Barks). In addition, this love triangle starts spinning its
tri-color passion on the eve of the 1832 revolution.
The film’s cast has
spoken at length about Hooper’s creative decision to have them sing live on
set, instead of pre-recording the soundtrack for them to lip-sync during the
shoot. This move gives the actors the freedom to experiment with different
line deliveries during takes. As a result, the film frames these solos primarily in close-ups and
medium close-ups.
The medium of film gains
an advantage over theatre since the players’ faces can be shown at a closer
distance, giving the viewer a more intimate glimpse into the pain and the
plight of the characters. However, this creative decision only works on a few
occasions here.
When Anne Hathaway belts
out “I Dreamed a Dream,” her anguished reminisce of days gone by is powerful –
and shot impressively in two uninterrupted takes. We can hear the aches and
creaks in her voice while seeing the desperation in the actor’s face. The two
long takes are emotionally devastating, guaranteeing her an Academy Award
nomination.
Both Redmayne (who sings
“Empty Chairs at Empty Tables”) and Barks (“On My Own”) also give their solos
similar gusto and dedication and have the chops to sell it at an onscreen
close-up. However, the sung soliloquies that comprise
quite a portion of the film’s soundtrack can only be visually arresting if the
performer is good enough for the material.
Unfortunately, Jackman doesn't have Colm
Wilkinson’s urgency and vocal power. Crowe, meanwhile, strains his throat and
stands mostly granite-faced throughout the film's duration, hardly an intimidating
villain.
Neither actor has the conviction to match their
stage counterparts, nor does the film's proletariat chorus have the range to match the level of a
community theatre production. Too many of the group lyrics are mumbled to the
point of incoherence.
To blame for these missteps is Hooper, more at home with television work for BBC and HBO (although he has a Best Director Oscar for The King’s Speech). It’s not just the film’s costumes and sets that are torn and sewery: the editing, especially in group scenes and numbers, is disjointed and often confusing, as the camera doesn’t hold on these miserables long enough.
Les Misérables has its
share of riveting moments and powerful showstoppers, but it is too inconsistent
to wholeheartedly embrace. The talent is mixed, the direction sloppy and the
characters mostly incomplete. Often, Les Misérables lacks showmanship when
it tries to be bombastic and integrity when it tries to be intimate. You will
hear the people strain.
I loved the movie, although there were some flaws. I thought Russell Crowe was a bad choice. I didn't like all the close ups of the stars singing and looking into their mouths. Maybe it could have been better, but I loved the music
ReplyDelete