Welcome!

"In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face, is that in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is probably more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. But there are times when a critic truly risks something, and that is in the discovery and defense of the new."
-Anton Ego, Ratatouille

With aspirations to become an arts/entertainment reporter or critic, I have started this website to post weekly reviews of the latest cinematic offerings from Hollywood and around the world. Currently studying Film and Journalism at Carleton University in Ottawa, Ontario, I hope my reviews here are the start to a long and fulfilling road down the path of reporting.

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Life Has a Way of Confusing Us, Blessing and Bruising Us

Footnote

*** out of ****

Directed by: Joseph Cedar

Starring: Shlomo Bar-Aba, Lior Ashkenazi, Alma Zack, Yuval Scharf and Micah Lewensohn

Running time: 106 minutes

Footnote is a quirky, colourful drama from Israel and a Foreign Language film nominee at the Oscars earlier this year. The film examines the relationship between a father and son, both accomplished Talmudic scholars in present-day Jerusalem.

The father, Prof. Eliezer Shkolnik (Shlomo Bar-Aba), spent close to 30 years researching different manuscripts of the Jerusalem Talmud, only to have another scholar, Yehuda Grossman (Micah Lewensohn), beat him to the chase and publish the same findings first.

The son, Prof. Uriel Shkolnik (Lior Ashkenazi), is a populist, favouring new methods of research and penning books about social issues in ancient times.

Both men’s offices are stacked with towers of texts, usually a signifier of knowledge, yet both men are unpractical. They know awfully little about communicating with each other.

The schism between father and son comes to a front when Eliezer is nominated for the Israel Prize, a major honour that Eliezer submitted his name for repeatedly. The conflict does not come from a jealousy between them, though, but a big misunderstanding.

The call for Eliezer was a mistake and should have gone to the other Prof. Shkolnik. Uriel learns of his triumph and the grave error from the committee chair: a crinkled, nasty Grossman – now the sealer of Eliezer’s disgruntlement for a second time.

The film is written and directed by American-born Israeli Joseph Cedar. Cedar manages to turn a film with very limited subject matter – Talmudic professorship – into a rollicking suspense-comedy, full of a cacophonous stringed score, surprising plot turns and suspenseful lead-ups to character interactions. From a subject so antiquated, a style so boldly executed is a relief.

The film’s most creative flourish is several montages. Both father and son are introduced in slide-formatted presentations, explaining their history, professional etiquette, favourite sayings (“You cannot base evidence on fools,” Eliezer quips), and other colourful anecdotes.

Bar-Aba, known for his comic chops in Israel, is superb as the grinchy Eliezer. He is twitchy and bitter in the film’s opening scene, when Uriel picks up a prestigious recognition from an Israeli Academy.

As Uriel thanks his father for committing him down the road of teaching, the camera doesn’t shy away from Eliezer’s stony reaction. He shuffles in his seat, looks bitter and never glances up at his son – a parental figure not full of pride but bottled rage.

He is not roused by his son’s accomplishments, which he believes are minor and superficial. Bar-Aba does a wonderful job expressing his envy without uttering a word.

However, Footnote abruptly ends with a cut to black that cops out the story instead of offering these two souls the closure they deserve. While ambiguous endings have become the popular way to tantalize an audience as the end credits roll, the film could have benefitted from explanation and not interpretation.

Moviegoers expect closure with a story as psychologically straightforward as Footnote’s. They are not as ready for interpretation when explanation will do just fine. They are not Talmudic scholars.

No comments:

Post a Comment