Welcome!

"In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and their selves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read. But the bitter truth we critics must face, is that in the grand scheme of things, the average piece of junk is probably more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. But there are times when a critic truly risks something, and that is in the discovery and defense of the new."
-Anton Ego, Ratatouille

With aspirations to become an arts/entertainment reporter or critic, I have started this website to post weekly reviews of the latest cinematic offerings from Hollywood and around the world. Currently studying Film and Journalism at Carleton University in Ottawa, Ontario, I hope my reviews here are the start to a long and fulfilling road down the path of reporting.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

My Pics for the 83rd Annual Academy Awards

On Sunday night, over 6,000 members from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences – a club consisting of the most prestigious artists working in the film industry today – will make history.

With the majority of Best Picture nominees also scoring at the box office, this is set to be one of the highest-rated Oscar telecasts in recent memory. So, what should your ballot look like? Here are my pics (not my personal choices, but who I think will win).

After taking home top honours from the Producers’, Screen Actors’ and Directors’ Guilds, The King’s Speech is the favourite to take Best Picture. Also count on Colin Firth to score his first Oscar for his deeply moving portrayal of King George VI (let's hope he doesn't stammer through his acceptance speech), and 73-year-old playwright David Seidler to take home a golden guy for his original screenplay. It would go against Oscar tradition for a prestigious historical drama not to win for either an art direction or costume design category, so expect the film to pick up the former.

The Social Network has its admirers, too, and due to its pre-nomination dominance, it will likely split the top honours with The King’s Speech. David Fincher should take Best Director, making it the fourth time in the last decade where a Best Director winner did not helm the Best Picture winner. Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross’s rumbling, atmospheric score and Aaron Sorkin’s blisteringly sharp adapted screenplay are also favourites in their respective categories. Kirk Baxter and Angus Wall should also take home an editing honour – they deserve something for keeping us so clearly attuned to Sorkin’s whip-snap dialogue and the constant shifts in time.

In the acting categories, expect Christian Bale and Natalie Portman to pick up honours. Bale’s co-star Melissa Leo was the front-runner for supporting actress until a recent, self-launched “For Your Consideration” campaign backfired. She now looks desperate to win. Academy members are bound to choose 14-year-old Hailee Steinfeld in Leo’s place (although I would choose Jacki Weaver for her devilishly good turn in the little-seen thriller, Animal Kingdom).

Inception, sans directing and acting nominations, will fare better in some of the technical categories. It could take Best Cinematography, but it has to beat True Grit’s Roger Deakins – winless after eight previous tries. Something tells me that the ninth time’s the charm.

Here are my pics for what and who I think WILL wiin at the 2010 Academy Awards:

Best Picture – The King’s Speech

Best Director – David Fincher, The Social Network

Best Actor in a Leading Role – Colin Firth, The King’s Speech

Best Actor in a Supporting Role – Christian Bale, The Fighter

Best Actress in a Leading Role – Natalie Portman, Black Swan

Best Actress in a Supporting Role – Hailee Steinfeld, True Grit

Best Original Screenplay – David Seidler, The King’s Speech

Best Adapted Screenplay – Aaron Sorkin, The Social Network

Best Animated Feature Film – Toy Story 3

Best Foreign Language Film – Incendies (Canada)

Best Documentary Feature – Inside Job

Best Documentary Short Subject – Strangers No More

Best Animated Short Film – The Gruffalo

Best Live Action Short Film – Na Wewe

Best Film Editing – The Social Network

Best Cinematography – True Grit

Best Art Direction – The King’s Speech

Best Costume Design – Alice in Wonderland

Best Original Score – The Social Network

Best Original Song – “We Belong Together,” Toy Story 3

Best Visual Effects – Inception

Best Sound Mixing – Inception

Best Sound Editing – Inception

Best Makeup – The Wolfman

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Clear Eyes, Full Hearts: A Tribute to Friday Night Lights

Since 9/11 and the subsequent wars on terror, there has been a fundamental shift in American dramatic television.

As of 2001, many programs have revolved around anti-heroes (Dexter, The Sopranos), conspiracy theories (Lost and its many facsimiles), the dark undercurrents of American social life (The Wire comes to mind) and the forces who serve and protect (24, NCIS).

Set in a brooding, dim and cynical world that exposed the villainy of the human psyche while glorifying the heroes dead set on catching these bad guys, television became as engaging as it had ever been. At the same time, news programs turned into entertainment, while entertainment programming turned into news.

Of course, a few programs got lost in the shuffle. One of those shows tried to do something different: it revolved around a bright, hopeful community dealing with the strains of their daily lives – and mostly succeeding.

It was a low-key, high-quality drama called Friday Night Lights, and even though it had much difficulty garnering an audience, it took five seasons and 76 episodes before it finally left the airwaves February 9, after a run on DirecTV (its final season will air on NBC, where the show's first two seasons were broadcasted, this April).

Friday Night Lights was inspired by a tremendously moving non-fiction sports book by H.G. Bissinger – which was also adapted into an impressively filmed if emotionally stagnant sports flick in 2004.

Its lack of exposure (and therefore, smaller budget) didn’t allow the show to revolutionize the medium of television. But, Lights was innovative, intelligent and intricate, a fascinating exploration of high school life that instantly ranked it as one of the finest shows on television.

For its first three seasons, Friday Night Lights dealt with a high school football team in small-town Texas called the Dillon Panthers. But the show was not about the plays, the hits and the glory of the touchdown as it was about two other elements: community and education.

In Dillon, there was no greater source of honour and respect than the Taylor family, consisting of the strict but deeply compassionate Panther coach Eric (Kyle Chandler) and his stoic and helpful wife, Tami (Connie Britton), a guidance counsellor and, later, principal of the local high school. Their daughter, Julie (Aimee Teegarden), had her father’s persistence and mother’s warmth, but also a tempestuous reluctance to authority. Or, as some would call it, adolescence.

The original young cast – which changed after seasons three and four, since teenagers do grow up and leave home – were given a giant blessing: the chance to play rich characters without succumbing to cliches.

These were ambitious characters, passionate and immensely likable but with the spontaneous insecurity and frustration that all teenagers have. Astoundingly, these characters transcended the typical high school clique conventions.

The main quarterback, Matt Saracen (Zach Gilford), was a gawky, endearing soul who cared for his ill grandmother as much as he studied the playbook. The handsome “bad boy,” Tim Riggins (Taylor Kitsch), was a saintly and understanding voice of reason, even if he slept around and should have opened up a liquor store in his kitchen. The stunning “naughty girl,” Tyra Collette (Adrianne Palicki), was vulnerable and aching to remove herself from the daily drudge of Dillon to make something of her life.

Most televised teenagers verge on extreme cliches, rarely allowing the actor to form any sort of complicated, multifaceted human being. Self-absorbed and superficial depictions of adolescence only contribute to keeping with the public’s view of teenagers as a shrill force of irresponsible indulgers and whiners. The writers of Friday Night Lights always took their teens seriously, refraining from treating them in a condescending light.

The teens on the show weren’t perfect, but they were on the pursuit to clean themselves up and become leaders, academically or on the field. It helped that the two figures primarily responsible for these changes were the coach and his wife. The Taylors, with their noble intentions, put much faith in their young community’s altruistic ideals.

It was easy as a high school student to relate to these undeniably complex characters. They were intimidated by the world outside their small red-state town yet daring to dream of the heights they could reach, and then persisted to make those dreams come true.

This all sounds sentimental and idealistic, but that’s what Friday Night Lights was at its best: a show that wore its heart on its tattered, muddy sleeve.

Interestingly, Friday Night Lights had a hard time picking up an audience likely due to its dismissal as a “sports drama.” Yet it was about football about as much as M*A*S*H was about combat.

The Dillon county was the most prominent character on the show. Its dusty fields, ramshackle homes and greasy local hangouts – staples of red state Americana – sheltered a community that seemed to have escaped the grandiose nature of the American dream. But Dillon did not feel like a setting – it was a small town whose purpose and specialty was to keep its residents close and connected.

To keep with this spirit and palpable sense of place, the crew of Friday Night Lights introduced a new way of shooting scripted drama - that of an American neorealist variety. The series was shot in the outskirts of Austin, Texas, mostly in pre-existing homes, bars and schools, with natural lighting by multiple cheap cameras that were shooting simultaneously. This allowed a more natural rhythm and pace for action and dialogue. And yes, there were a bit of “shaky camera” jitters, here and there.

The two “veterans” of the cast, Chandler and Britton, used this new shooting style to their advantage to create gut-wrenching realism – adding up to what has been repeatedly called by critics, and affirmed by myself, as the finest marriage on contemporary television.

The subtle changes in tone and the mild nuances in facial expression that a rushed series would skip over were all caught on camera. A scene between the two actors could only consist of understanding looks – whether a smile or a grimace – but it spoke volumes to viewers. For a medium that depends on “telling the audience,” Lights transcended the television conventions.

But what about the football, the prime reason many started watching Lights in the first place? Even with a low budget, the football sequences were tense and remarkably exciting, albeit succinct.

There’s a reason for this cut in length, though: it’s not the drama on the field we’re invested in but what happens off the field. Any creative venture in film or television that involves sports can only hope to stay true to that statement.

I don’t mean to make Friday Night Lights seem saintly in terms of its subject matter, since there were a plethora of provocative issues that the characters dealt with, episode to episode. Regardless, it is one of the only shows I can think of that deals with religion sympathetically, rather than as a mocking point.

In one of the show’s most memorable episodes, one of the coaches accidentally makes a racist comment to a reporter, and has to suffer the sting of the Black community, including some of the African-American characters, who desert the team. In another episode, a student comes to Tami for advice on whether or not to get an abortion. Tami tells her to get rid of the unborn child – and is subsequently fired, as a result.

Hot-button episodes are sometimes produced as a means to raise a show’s profile as an important teaching tool. Lights didn’t preach to its viewers by seeking to teach the audience ahead of the character, though, but did the opposite.

Friday Night Lights didn’t change television, but it did raise the bar of how to chronicle American life in a way that was both stunningly realistic and unequivocally hopeful. It managed to show the victories and the failures of a small Texas community with a searing honesty that resonated with its small audience.

What most resonates after five glorious seasons (well, four, considering the lackluster second season) is not the touchdowns scored but the cheers from the adoring community on the sidelines. Football was never the focus of Friday Night Lights. The strong, vocal, resilient community was.

It was about the motto of self-improvement that hung on the walls of the Dillon Panther locker room: “Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can’t Lose.” Maybe if we all stick together and dedicate ourselves toward helping our community, we can reach the pinnacle of our own strength. We can only reach those heights if we depend on each other – on our teachers, on our friends and on our families.

Friday Night Lights used its complex characters, compelling storytelling and innovative production values to become more than your typical television drama. It was, simply, a clear-eyed, full-hearted portrait of small-town America at its most sublime.

Saturday, February 5, 2011

All These Things We'll One Day Swallow Whole

Incendies

***1/2 out of ****

Directed by: Denis Villeneuve

Starring: Lubna Azabal, Melissa Desormeaux-Poulin, Remy Girard, Maxim Gaudette and Allen Altman

Running time: 130 minutes

When Jeanne (Melissa Desormeaux-Poulin) and her twin brother, Simon (Maxim Gaudette), are given the will of their late Arab-Canadian mother, Nawal Marwan, the instructions are not as they expect.

The twins are asked to deliver two envelopes: one is addressed to their brother, who they never knew existed, while the other is for the father, who they long presumed to be dead. They also get the order to bury her face down, away from the world.

With her interest piqued by this quest, Jeanne departs from Montreal to Fuad, a fictional Middle Eastern nation, to track down her family while trying to uncover the reason behind her mother’s, well, grave request.

And thus begins the opening reel of Incendies, a shocking detective thriller based upon an acclaimed stage play by Wajdi Mouawad. It is a chilling exploration into the horrors of political strife and civil war, tackled as fearlessly as its French-Canadian writer/director, Denis Villeneuve, did for another uncompromising subject, the Polytechnique massacre, in his previous film.

This film could also help Canada score its second Foreign Language Oscar victory in seven years (Denys Arcand took home the prize for The Barbarian Invasions in 2004), and it certainly deserves the honour.

Incendies (translated as “Scorched” in English) jumps back and forth between Jeanne’s travels throughout Fuad and flashbacks to Nawal as a young woman (portrayed by Lubna Azabal). When Jeanne asks a clan of Muslim women if they know her family name, several of them glare at her with disgust, as if she had yelled a racial epithet.

Taken aback, Jeanne gets the hint that she is not wanted, and that Nawal’s exodus from the vapid wasteland region – modeled off Lebanon, as well as its devastating 1975-90 civil war – was done to protect her children from a lifetime of shame. She plods further on, but the unsettling details have only begun to take shape.

Unwilling to spoil some shocking plot developments, I will reveal that Nawal’s story, which occupies half of the film’s screen time, is relentlessly taxing and quite grotesque – especially for those sensitive to sexual violence and the murdering of young children. And if the graphic atrocities prove to be too much, beware: the final twist is numbing.

The prologue, set to a rumbling Radiohead tune, takes place in a grimy room of Muslim boys as their heads are being shaved. They are stony and expressionless, except their eyes glare at the camera. The rest of the film seethes with the same wallowing anger, depicted by Andre Turpin’s stark, sun-baked photography (the film was shot in the Jordanian countryside) and casual wallops of explosive violence, intricately executed by Villeneuve.

With her eyes intent but spirit slowly shattering, Azabal is riveting as Nawal, trying to move past the trauma and bloodshed, even as acrid fumes of injustice billow through her homeland, threatening to suffocate her will to live.

Incendies may be a downer, but it is a blisteringly powerful one, complete with sharp performances and brave, confident direction by one of Canada’s premiere filmmakers.